A new study has found that fighters that successfully achieve rapid weight gain before an MMA fight have a significantly better chance of winning on fight night.
Several studies have previously been published detailing the effect that rapid weight cuts — which are common in mixed martial arts and to a lesser extent boxing — can have on athletic performance. Due to the many injuries and even deaths linked to these practices, athletic commissions often hope to persuade athletes to avoid rapid weight cutting. Pointing to such decreased athletic performance.
A recent study, however, highlighted that rapid weight gain after official weigh-ins, but prior to competition can significantly predict who will win the fight based on who gained back the most mass.
Can a successful rapid weight gain increase an MMA fighters chances of winning?
The study, titled Rapid weight gain predicts fight success in mixed martial arts – evidence from 1,400 weigh-ins, published in the European Journal of Sports Science, boasts that it is the largest real-world sample to date studying the issue. In it, the authors reviewed 1,400 weigh-ins from 21 MMA promotions regulated in California. The data revealed that for each additional 1% body mass gained back post-weigh-in, a fighter’s chance of winning increased by a staggering 4.5%.
The full abstract reads as follows and should be eye-opening to any athletic commissions as an example of the very real effects of rapid extreme weight cutting in professional and amateur combat sports.
“We aimed to analyze whether rapid weight gain (RWG) between the official weigh-in and the time of the fight was associated with fightsuccess in MMA. A total of 700 professional MMA fights involving 1,400 weigh-ins from 21 MMA promotions regulated by the California State Athletic Commission were analyzed. Multilevel logistic regression accounting for individual (i.e., athlete) and cluster levels (i.e., fights) was used to analyze the association of all measures with a theoretical relationship with the dependent variable and without interdependency with one another (i.e., %RWG, sex, body mass division, competition level) with the fight outcome (i.e., win or loss).
The odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated. The highest mean %RWG was found for the flyweight, bantamweight, featherweight, and lightweight divisions. The %RWG significantly predicted the fight outcome (ß=0.044; OR=1.045; 95%CI=1.014–1.078; p=0.005) so that for each 1% of additional RWG, the chance of winning increased by 4.5%. With the largest sample to date and in a ‘real-world’ scenario, the present results suggest that the magnitude of RWG is linked to the chance of winning in MMA combats.
It is suggested that regulatory commissions, confederations, and event organizers should consider regulating RWG, considering that, despite its detrimental impact on the athletes’ health and performance, the potential advantage might stimulate athletes to invest in rapid weight loss, followed by gain after the official weigh-in to increase their chance of winning.”
This data surely does add to the debate that serious weight cuts can be detrimental to athletes. However, it does give credence to the idea that in an even matchup of skills, the good big man can beat a good small man. This could also lead to fighters taking on weight cuts they can’t make and lead to the truly disatrous and life threatening outcomes we have seen for fighters all over the industry, including in the UFC.
It’s why the study suggests, commissions may want to consider regulating how much weight athletes are allowed to cut to make division limits. A strategy that is used by ONE Championship. The promotion regulates weight cuts using their hydration protocols, which sets limits on how much water fighters can cut to make weight.
What are your thoughts on the study, and does it change your opinion on the topic of weight cutting in MMA?
